| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot |
| Date: | 2021-10-01 02:25:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JwZL8eP-5SNswBGXAo6Ne0RD1t6QoXsnxzm1nnW3Rdzw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 6:36 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:45 AM Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:14:23AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 5:29 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> > > <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I agree. Sorry for missing that.
> > > >
> > > > The updated patch looks good to me.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Pushed!
> > >
> >
> > This patch is still on "Needs review"!
> > Should we change it to Committed or is expected something else
> > about it?
>
> Yes, the patch already gets committed (4c347885). So I also think we
> should mark it as Committed.
>
Right, I have changed the status to Committed.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2021-10-01 04:26:11 | Re: non-superusers are allowed to drop the replication user, but are not allowed to alter or even create them, is that ok? |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-10-01 02:23:44 | minor gripe about lax reloptions parsing for views |