| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: parallelize queries containing initplans |
| Date: | 2017-10-30 03:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JvX9mjuZm2fFN3pbX3JpsFLKF5r3n=RDHn8dZgwipAGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:06 PM, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 10/11/2017 12:42 PM, tushar wrote:
>>
>> On 10/09/2017 03:26 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>>
>>> I have reverted the check
>>> in the attached patch.
>>
>>
>> I have applied this patch against PG HEAD and run sqlsmith and analyzed
>> results . didn't find any specific failures against this patch.
>>
> I did some testing of this feature and written few testcases . PFA the sql
> file(along with the expected .out file) .
>
Thanks a lot Tushar for testing this patch. In the latest patch, I
have just rebased some comments, there is no code change, so I don't
expect any change in behavior, but feel free to test it once again.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-10-30 04:34:15 | Re: Parallel worker error |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-10-30 03:30:55 | Re: parallelize queries containing initplans |