Re: Logical replication timeout problem

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Logical replication timeout problem
Date: 2022-05-04 10:18:47
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JuhAuG-SzxCXi5YMhpKvGT_-boJT61e7Z14qfp6AwG6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 11:32 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So, shall we go back to the previous approach of using a separate
> > function update_replication_progress?
>
> Ok, agreed.
>

Attached, please find the updated patch accordingly. Currently, I have
prepared it for HEAD, if you don't see any problem with this, we can
prepare the back-branch patches based on this.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v20-0001-Fix-the-logical-replication-timeout-during-large.patch application/octet-stream 14.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-05-04 10:27:34 Re: Hash index build performance tweak from sorting
Previous Message vignesh C 2022-05-04 06:47:00 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup