Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-01-06 03:36:58
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Ju6JJEd3zoDfBx4OzVaWR9erj9aX6jcjwsZgWaZRS7wQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:31 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 2:51 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > Other than this I've noticed a few typos that are not in the patch but
> > in the surrounding code.
> > logical.c: 1383: Comment should mention stream_commit_cb not stream_abort_cb.
> > decode.c: 686 - Extra "it's" here: "because it's it happened"
> >
>
> Anything not related to this patch, please post in a separate email.
>

Pushed the fix for above reported typos.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-01-06 03:53:16 Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-01-06 03:35:43 Re: data_checksums enabled by default (was: Move --data-checksums to common options in initdb --help)