From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes |
Date: | 2017-03-23 03:13:20 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JtxtiddvHZnELDYFoUxcocuOhxEQ3yPKo=wCpFx5oAfg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> To fix this, I think we should pass 'REGBUF_KEEP_DATA' while
> registering the buffer. Something like this,
>
> - XLogRegisterBuffer(0, buf, REGBUF_STANDARD);
> + XLogRegisterBuffer(0, buf, REGBUF_STANDARD |
> REGBUF_KEEP_DATA);
>
> Attached is the patch that fixes this issue.
>
I think this will work, but not sure if there is a merit to deviate
from what btree does to handle this case. One thing I find slightly
awkward in hash_xlog_vacuum_get_latestRemovedXid() is that you are
using a number of tuples registered as part of fixed data
(xl_hash_vacuum_one_page) to traverse the data registered as buf data.
I think it will be better if we register offsets also in fixed part of
data as we are doing btree case.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-03-23 03:25:07 | Re: [PATCH] Transaction traceability - txid_status(bigint) |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-03-23 03:13:07 | Re: Radix tree for character conversion |