Re: Fix WITHOUT OVERLAPS multirange with location replication

On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 4:55 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > 1) The change to RelationFindDeletedTupleInfoByIndex() doesn't seem to
> > be covered by a test. Maybe we could add a case to 035_conflicts.pl?
>
> This was tricky, but I figured out a way to do it. My test adds a row
> on the publisher before creating the subscription, then uses
> copy_data=false. Then I add & delete a "decoy" row with a different
> multirange but the same lossy bounding range. When the publisher
> updates the first row, it gets update_deleted before the fix and
> update_missing after.
>

I think this test is timing dependent because if Delete happens before
Update, the conflict slot could be updated and the row could be
removed. If it is too tricky/tough to write this test, we can even
skip it.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.