Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD
Date: 2017-12-14 02:19:33
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Jfo71xtJ7TtyWAYZoWCr_AOcKqcfs2AUVTsj64j3bxyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Kuntal Ghosh
> <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've also verified the backward scan case with the query provided by
>> Thomas. In standby,
>> 2. explain analyze select * from t1 where a+1>a order by a desc; and
>> the parallel workers hang.
>> The patch fixes the issue.
>
> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>

Thanks.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2017-12-14 02:41:01 Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-12-14 02:18:26 Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com