Re: Logical replication timeout problem

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tang, Haiying/唐 海英 <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication timeout problem
Date: 2022-01-07 10:26:14
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JfPDev7BkUc0qSFcn33Q-fy5ro2Pk23LFJ2vF9m=HGQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 5:02 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> I put the instance with high level debug mode.
> I try to do some log interpretation: After having finished writing the
> modifications generated by the insert in the snap files,
> then these files are read (restored). One minute after this work starts,
> the worker process exit with an error code = 1.
> I see that keepalive messages were sent before the work process work leave.
>
> 2021-12-28 10:50:01.894 CET [55792] LOCATION: WalSndKeepalive,
> walsender.c:3365
> ...
> 2021-12-28 10:50:31.854 CET [55792] STATEMENT: START_REPLICATION SLOT
> "sub008_s012a00" LOGICAL 17/27240748 (proto_version '1', publication_names
> '"pub008_s012a00"')
> 2021-12-28 10:50:31.907 CET [55792] DEBUG: 00000: StartTransaction(1)
> name: unnamed; blockState: DEFAULT; state: INPROGR, xid/subid/cid: 0/1/0
> 2021-12-28 10:50:31.907 CET [55792] LOCATION: ShowTransactionStateRec,
> xact.c:5075
> 2021-12-28 10:50:31.907 CET [55792] STATEMENT: START_REPLICATION SLOT
> "sub008_s012a00" LOGICAL 17/27240748 (proto_version '1', publication_names
> '"pub008_s012a00"')
> 2021-12-28 10:50:31.907 CET [55792] DEBUG: 00000: spill 2271 changes in
> XID 14312 to disk
> 2021-12-28 10:50:31.907 CET [55792] LOCATION: ReorderBufferSerializeTXN,
> reorderbuffer.c:2245
> 2021-12-28 10:50:31.907 CET [55792] STATEMENT: START_REPLICATION SLOT
> "sub008_s012a00" LOGICAL 17/27240748 (proto_version '1', publication_names
> '"pub008_s012a00"')
> *2021-12-28 10:50:32.110 CET [55792] DEBUG: 00000: restored 4096/22603999
> changes from disk*
> 2021-12-28 10:50:32.110 CET [55792] LOCATION: ReorderBufferIterTXNNext,
> reorderbuffer.c:1156
> 2021-12-28 10:50:32.110 CET [55792] STATEMENT: START_REPLICATION SLOT
> "sub008_s012a00" LOGICAL 17/27240748 (proto_version '1', publication_names
> '"pub008_s012a00"')
> 2021-12-28 10:50:32.138 CET [55792] DEBUG: 00000: restored 4096/22603999
> changes from disk
> ...
>
> *2021-12-28 10:50:35.341 CET [55794] DEBUG: 00000: sending replication
> keepalive2021-12-28 10:50:35.341 CET [55794] LOCATION: WalSndKeepalive,
> walsender.c:3365*
> ...
> *2021-12-28 10:51:31.995 CET [55791] ERROR: XX000: terminating logical
> replication worker due to timeout*
>
> *2021-12-28 10:51:31.995 CET [55791] LOCATION: LogicalRepApplyLoop,
> worker.c:1267*
>
>
It is still not clear to me why the problem happened? IIUC, after restoring
4096 changes from snap files, we send them to the subscriber, and then
apply worker should apply those one by one. Now, is it taking one minute to
restore 4096 changes due to which apply worker is timed out?

Could this function in* Apply main loop* in worker.c help to find a
> solution?
>
> rc = WaitLatchOrSocket(MyLatch,
> WL_SOCKET_READABLE | WL_LATCH_SET |
> WL_TIMEOUT | WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH,
> fd, wait_time,
> WAIT_EVENT_LOGICAL_APPLY_MAIN);
>

Can you explain why you think this will help in solving your current
problem?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2022-01-07 11:03:55 Re: Use generation context to speed up tuplesorts
Previous Message Tatsuro Yamada 2022-01-07 09:30:30 Re: \dP and \dX use ::regclass without "pg_catalog."