Re: Choosing parallel_degree

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Andreas Ulbrich <andreas(dot)ulbrich(at)matheversum(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Date: 2016-04-14 02:51:34
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JdiE6yxkJtWfrnWnn5-SyfrVXRpNrJbi-fP_SBCQCjig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> I would be inclined to view this as a reasonable 9.6 cleanup of
> parallel query, but other people may wish to construe things more
> strictly than I would.
>

+1.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2016-04-14 03:03:18 EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-04-14 02:45:14 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2