Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Date: 2016-09-05 09:27:19
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JcyjZsDoaZ_RJn8Y_patJ8YzudMqDPwTgPH0xPSFyCuQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This thread started a year ago, different people contributed various
>> patches, some of which already got committed. Can someone please post a
>> summary of this thread, so that it's a bit more clear what needs
>> review/testing, what are the main open questions and so on?
>>
>> I'm interested in doing some tests on the hardware I have available, but
>> I'm not willing spending my time untangling the discussion.
>>
>
> I signed up for reviewing this patch. But as Amit explained later, there are
> two different and independent implementations to solve the problem. Since
> Tomas has volunteered to do some benchmarking, I guess I should wait for the
> results because that might influence which approach we choose.
>
> Does that sound correct?
>

Sounds correct to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-09-05 09:27:53 Re: Optimization for lazy_scan_heap
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2016-09-05 09:26:39 Unused function arguments