Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 2:42 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 5:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:58 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > OK. Now using your suggested 2nd sentence:
> > >
> > > +# The subscription's running status and failover option should be preserved
> > > +# in the upgraded instance. So regress_sub1 should still have
> > > subenabled,subfailover
> > > +# set to true, while regress_sub2 should have both set to false.
> > >
> > > ~
> > >
> > > I also tweaked some other nearby comments/messages which did not
> > > mention the 'failover' preservation.
> > >
> >
> > Looks mostly good to me. One minor nitpick:
> > *
> > along with retaining the replication origin's remote lsn
> > -# and subscription's running status.
> > +# and subscription's running status and failover option.
> >
> > I don't think we need to use 'and' twice in the above sentence. We
> > should use ',' between different properties. I can change this on
> > Monday and push it unless you think otherwise.
> >
>
> +1
>

Pushed!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.