| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans |
| Date: | 2018-08-05 12:08:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JZLxD0qpZ6orsDCk4sGt426G_LTvsOPSwvFuZ546HyiA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2018-Aug-03, Adrien NAYRAT wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/2018 10:39 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> > Thanks. I have pushed those two patches.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> I am marking this open item as closed. If that's wrong, let's hear why
>
Thanks, it is not wrong. I initially thought I will close it after
committing the pending patch which I just posted. However, it is okay
as that is to address a somewhat related, but a different issue.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-08-05 12:08:08 | Re: Negotiating the SCRAM channel binding type |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-08-05 12:04:30 | Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans |