| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bogus: logical replication rows/cols combinations |
| Date: | 2022-05-18 02:28:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JYDhphoygZHuhCyFtkk-5aqdhpj7JqH9dg0wDZp=x9mQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 2:40 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Attach the new version patch which addressed all the above comments and
> comments from Shi yu[1] and Osumi-san[2].
>
Thanks, your first patch looks good to me. I'll commit that tomorrow
unless there are more comments on the same. The second one is also in
good shape but I would like to test it a bit more and also see if
others have any suggestions/objections on the same.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-05-18 03:00:38 | RE: Skipping schema changes in publication |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-05-18 02:19:31 | Re: funcs.sgml - wrong example |