Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Date: 2022-09-09 05:42:02
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JY77gj29YcMHLR_CpL8vAu_Zr8U9mNWgsUjqdSZTsdAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:32 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> The attached patch has the changes to handle the same.
>

Pushed. I am not completely sure whether we want the remaining
documentation patch in this thread in its current form or by modifying
it. Johnathan has shown some interest in it. I feel you can start a
separate thread for it to see if there is any interest in the same and
close the CF entry for this work.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-09-09 05:58:19 Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema
Previous Message bt22kawamotok 2022-09-09 05:28:39 is_superuser is not documented