From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: persist logical slots to disk during shutdown checkpoint |
Date: | 2023-09-04 09:50:04 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JSdyumUJ1eaP1==98bsD8rrju7xdfqx72MSS1iXZCLTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 10:50 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 10:06, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 6:12 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> > <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 2:52 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All but one. Normally, the idea of marking dirty is to indicate that
> > > > we will actually write/flush the contents at a later point (except
> > > > when required for correctness) as even indicated in the comments atop
> > > > ReplicatioinSlotMarkDirty(). However, I see your point that we use
> > > > that protocol at all the current places including CreateSlotOnDisk().
> > > > So, we can probably do it here as well.
> > >
> > > yes
> > >
> >
> > I think we should also ensure that slots are not invalidated
> > (slot.data.invalidated != RS_INVAL_NONE) before marking them dirty
> > because we don't allow decoding from such slots, so we shouldn't
> > include those.
>
> Added this check.
>
> Apart from this I have also fixed the following issues that were
> agreed on: a) Setting slots to dirty in CheckPointReplicationSlots
> instead of setting it in SaveSlotToPath
>
+ if (is_shutdown && SlotIsLogical(s))
+ {
+ SpinLockAcquire(&s->mutex);
+ if (s->data.invalidated == RS_INVAL_NONE &&
+ s->data.confirmed_flush != s->last_saved_confirmed_flush)
+ s->dirty = true;
I think it is better to use ReplicationSlotMarkDirty() as that would
be consistent with all other usages.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2023-09-04 10:15:07 | Re: persist logical slots to disk during shutdown checkpoint |
Previous Message | jian he | 2023-09-04 08:48:02 | Re: Incremental View Maintenance, take 2 |