Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes
Date: 2017-03-24 07:49:59
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JPWawfhB655sM9CBxcWNB2hYXPTkFN1JhmYeNqCP+SaA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
>> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
>
> okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
>

Thanks, this version looks good to me.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Khandekar 2017-03-24 07:53:01 Re: Parallel Append implementation
Previous Message Rajkumar Raghuwanshi 2017-03-24 07:41:54 Re: Parallel Append implementation