| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
| Date: | 2016-06-29 06:51:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JNVHTQ_yE7XqsKNgS2aR7_No0ymOvFFU_Jk5j7jpmkgg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Julien Rouhaud
<julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> Or should we allow setting it to -1 for instance to disable the limit?
>
By disabling the limit, do you mean to say that only
max_parallel_workers_per_gather will determine the workers required or
something else? If earlier, then I am not sure if it is good idea,
because it can cause some confusion to the user about usage of both
the parameters together.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-06-29 06:51:45 | Re: ToDo: API for SQL statement execution other than SPI |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2016-06-29 06:24:23 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |