| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Date: | 2026-08-03 04:07:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JN2STMUZXGB-3JWAPBGE6-hasCLRwBeCf91EWnCd71zg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 8:13 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2026 21:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> > So I think we should let this slip for pg19, and get this patch reviewed
> > and pushed early in pg20 in the coming weeks, so that we have more of a
> > chance to discover breakage in the time until pg20 release next year.
>
This decision sounds reasonable to me.
> There's still an open item for this on the wiki [1]. Is the decision to
> let this slip for pg19? If so, please update the open items list. Thanks!
>
We should move this item from Open Issues list of PG19.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2026-08-03 04:19:11 | Re: pgstat: Flush some statistics within running transactions, take 2 |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2026-08-03 03:59:40 | Re: A new C function `get_partition_root`. |