From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGDOCS - add more links in the pub/sub reference pages |
Date: | 2023-10-10 12:33:05 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JMzs4rREnOzUsmqLKD4nsJNCVmQG1e_J6jame1kD1Pow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:40 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 08:47, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > PSA v3.
>
> Few more instances in other logical replication related pages:
> 1) Another instance was in alter_subscription.sgml:
> Fetch missing table information from publisher. This will start
> replication of tables that were added to the subscribed-to publications
> since <command>CREATE SUBSCRIPTION</command> or
> the last invocation of <command>REFRESH PUBLICATION</command>.
>
Do we want each and every occurrence of the commands to have
corresponding links? I am not against it if we think that is useful
for users but asking as I am not aware of the general practice we
follow in this regard. Does anyone else have any opinion on this
matter?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-10-10 12:47:39 | Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2023-10-10 12:24:28 | Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session |