Re: PGDOCS - add more links in the pub/sub reference pages

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGDOCS - add more links in the pub/sub reference pages
Date: 2023-10-10 12:33:05
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JMzs4rREnOzUsmqLKD4nsJNCVmQG1e_J6jame1kD1Pow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:40 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 08:47, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > PSA v3.
>
> Few more instances in other logical replication related pages:
> 1) Another instance was in alter_subscription.sgml:
> Fetch missing table information from publisher. This will start
> replication of tables that were added to the subscribed-to publications
> since <command>CREATE SUBSCRIPTION</command> or
> the last invocation of <command>REFRESH PUBLICATION</command>.
>

Do we want each and every occurrence of the commands to have
corresponding links? I am not against it if we think that is useful
for users but asking as I am not aware of the general practice we
follow in this regard. Does anyone else have any opinion on this
matter?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-10-10 12:47:39 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2023-10-10 12:24:28 Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session