Re: Heavily modified big table bloat even in auto vacuum is running

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Haribabu kommi <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Heavily modified big table bloat even in auto vacuum is running
Date: 2013-12-16 14:26:51
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JKrhyoYUnVKBKzJWsPNJx3u7QWHojcf2jteWsWgFqP+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Amit, if you think this patch is ready now, please mark it as Ready for
> Committer. Otherwise, I encourage your to continue the discussion and
> possibly resubmit the patch to the next commitfest.

Only one test is pending from myside to conclude. I am planing to
complete it tomorrow.
Is it okay?

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-12-16 14:36:28 Re: row security roadmap proposal
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-12-16 14:14:24 Re: Assertion failure in base backup code path