| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: doc patch: correct function name for slot synchronization. |
| Date: | 2025-08-21 09:13:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JJzXMztyfH0uj3DYMzmjAui3UPUUpAtU+o=74yKyW0_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 2:24 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Dear hackers,
> (CC: Amit and Shveta, who were the committer and author)
>
> While working on the translation project of manuals, I found below sentence:
>
> >
> When slot synchronization is configured as recommended, and the initial
> synchronization is performed either automatically or manually via
> pg_sync_replication_slot, ...
> >
>
> However, the correct function name is pg_sync_replication_slots, and it should
> be tagged as a function. Please see attached to address the issue. The typo exists
> till PG17.
>
Thanks for noticing this and providing a patch. I'll take care of this.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-08-21 09:55:29 | Re: memory leak in logical WAL sender with pgoutput's cachectx |
| Previous Message | Shubham Khanna | 2025-08-21 09:08:33 | Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber. |