| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench more operators & functions |
| Date: | 2016-04-04 07:00:12 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JJPinZKDorzimx2gD3WLYx60otJAstX6qMU-C5Ne-zMw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2016-04-04 06:18:47 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I'd say "why not wait?". Minor, non-urgent patches will definitely go
> > nowhere for a long time, so it gains nobody to submit now.
> >
> > Submitting patches during freeze has been discouraged for many years, so
> > asking a long term contributor to avoid sending multiple minor patches
is
> > in line with that.
>
> I don't see much point in asking people to postpone. I do think however
> it can make sense to respond with something like:
> Fabien, you've been submitting a lot of patches over the last
> year. Thanks for the that! To keep up with the amount of incoming work
> the prject relies on contributors also shouldering some review
> responsibility. Please consider focusing on that, while we're working on
> getting 9.6 ready.
>
>
+1. Extremely positive and encouraging way of involving other people.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-04-04 07:06:43 | Re: Timeline following for logical slots |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-04-04 06:55:05 | Re: Choosing parallel_degree |