Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date: 2021-02-10 05:32:24
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JHBqwtGcdjRnaCoD+_1G87pFnVw3AJjyBGx+YTN=uZTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:41 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:38 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> PSA v2 of this WalRcvExceResult patch (it is same as v1 but includes
> some PG doc updates).
> This applies OK on top of v30 of the main patch.
>

Thanks, I have integrated these changes into the main patch and
additionally made some changes to comments and docs. I have also fixed
the function name inconsistency issue you reported and ran pgindent.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v31-0001-Allow-multiple-xacts-during-table-sync-in-logica.patch application/octet-stream 63.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-02-10 05:42:04 Re: [patch] bit XOR aggregate functions
Previous Message Hou, Zhijie 2021-02-10 05:17:15 RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)