| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use correct type for catalog_xmin |
| Date: | 2026-06-08 06:07:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JENdPiJmW2xS00i954oUgfX-cYZ-2WhPU+1nkRCTG+wg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:05 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 8:52 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:33 PM Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > In commit 85c17f6, the variable old_catalog_xmin is using the type
> > > XLogRecPtr, even though data.catalog_xmin is a TransactionId.
> > >
> > > Attached patch fixes this by using TransactionId instead
> >
> > Yes. Looks like a copy-pasto in 85c17f612af7b9c47a9828805686f0dd2433cdf1.
> >
> > Patch LGTM.
>
> LGTM.
>
> This does not seem to cause any functional issue even without the fix,
> since the variable is only used for an equality check. However, the type
> is clearly incorrect, so I think it's better to backpatch it through v17.
>
+1.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lukas Fittl | 2026-06-08 06:08:13 | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-06-08 05:45:40 | Re: bugfix - fix broken output in expanded aligned format, when data are too short |