Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in determining the timestamp of the db statfile.
Date: 2020-09-12 11:49:24
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J8fcbjSd-Kp1LYa8s0kFMuLmDqFFgYD1aqimkgjW-VyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:13 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> BTW, do we want to backpatch this? There is no user reported bug and
> not sure if the user will encounter any problem. I think it is a minor
> improvement and more of code consistency. So, making HEAD only change
> should be okay.
>

Seeing no other opinions, pushed this in Head.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2020-09-12 13:12:02 Function to execute a program
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-09-12 11:47:13 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions