Re: a funnel by any other name

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: a funnel by any other name
Date: 2015-09-17 09:23:34
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J5fq0i=mLRDZQTwMvrW96=NLiZb10bCEJVDNOOrLMZAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Or, yet another option, we could combine the similar operators under
> one umbrella while keeping the things that are more different as
> separate nodes:
>
> 1, 2. Exchange (or Gather or Funnel)
> 3, 5. Distribute (or Redistribute or Interchange or Exchange)
> 4. Exchange Merge (or Gather Merge or Funnel Merge)
>

+1 for combining, but it seems better to call 1,2 as Parallel Gather
and similarly for others. Adding Parallel to Gather makes it
self-explanatory.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-09-17 09:55:57 Re: On-demand running query plans using auto_explain and signals
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-09-17 06:54:35 Re: Parallel Seq Scan