Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Date: 2026-06-15 09:06:09
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J4rNW7tJLaMS50nr9uu=ddf7LSO5=oP6rVPgFQMoJ8Ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 11:36 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> A trivial review comment for v50-0003.
>
> ======
> src/backend/replication/logical/conflict.c
>
> 1.
> +void
> +ProcessPendingConflictLogTuple(void)
> +{
> + Relation conflictlogrel;
> + ConflictLogDest dest;
> +
> + /* Nothing to do */
> + if (MyLogicalRepWorker->conflict_log_tuple == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + PG_TRY();
> + {
>
> Those 2 variables are only used within the PG_TRY block, so they can
> be declared there.
>

I request you to please collect all such code-level comments and share
as one email. I know it is not always possible and sometimes it is
good to share whatever one has reviewed. However, sometimes, I get the
feeling that I may overlook some other key design related comment by
someone which needs more discussion. I understand that I am no one to
tell how you or someone should share her/his review but this is just a
humble request and if you don't like it, feel free to ignore it.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2026-06-15 09:08:36 Re: Reduce LEFT/FULL JOIN to ANTI JOIN in more cases
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2026-06-15 09:04:01 Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream