Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_verify_checksums vs windows
Date: 2018-08-31 10:19:06
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J2dbdUdgAtRZz2CyOrojp4e=Nk-PH5QeBkcKgWQgM8wA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 5:04 PM Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Okay. I will commit this in a day or so after once verifying it on
>> PG11 as well. I think this needs to be backpatched, let me know if
>> you think otherwise.
>>
>
> Definitely a bug so yes, it needs backpatching.
>

Okay, pushed!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2018-08-31 10:24:06 Re: Undo logs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-31 10:18:52 Re: Negotiating the SCRAM channel binding type