Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Date: 2019-12-09 09:07:17
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J1RxmXFAHC34S4_BznT76cfbrvqORSk23iBgRAOj1azw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:27 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have modified the patch for the above points and additionally ran
> pgindent. Let me know what you think about the attached patch?
>

A new version with a slightly modified commit message.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Delete-empty-pages-in-each-pass-during-GIST-VACUUM.patch application/octet-stream 15.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rushabh Lathia 2019-12-09 09:22:34 Re: backup manifests
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-12-09 09:04:06 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?