From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Vitale, Anthony, Sony Music" <anthony(dot)vitale(at)sonymusic(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Question on any plans to use the User Server/User Mapping to provide Logical Replication Subscriptions the user/password in an encrypted manner |
Date: | 2025-07-23 04:43:56 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1J+uTyewrh4f93v_Qm2=Rfz43f_O0qi65=pzgJ2cFBPKg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:33 PM Vitale, Anthony, Sony Music
<anthony(dot)vitale(at)sonymusic(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Yes, it is exactly what I am looking for
>
> However, it appears that this patch (The Ability to create server with FOR CONNECTION ONLY) was never implemented OR at least I can't find it.
>
> Do you know if there is any way to find out what ever happened to this ?
>
I see that the last version of the patch is posted in email [1]. Then
there were some comments which Jeff told he will address for next
release, see [2]. You can help by reviewing/testing the patch or if
the author doesn't have time, you can ask in that thread whether you
can continue working on the patch by addressing open comments.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e0c6fd0fa6036df36779c8bd8ae763c6f4064135.camel%40j-davis.com
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/606b345bcbcb229515ab155e37e13de9333f2c09.camel%40j-davis.com
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2025-07-23 05:04:37 | recoveryStopsAfter is not usable when recovery_target_inclusive is false |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2025-07-23 04:38:43 | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |