Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Date: 2015-09-04 01:15:07
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+6mhzV-w3r+s39shy9qViS6asp6-SLhQEczBT2TAgWAg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > [ new patch ]
>
> Andres pinged me about this patch today. It contained a couple of
> very strange whitespace anomalies, but otherwise looked OK to me, so I
> committed it with after fixing those issues and tweaking the comments
> a bit.

Thanks for looking into it.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-09-04 01:20:39 Re: BRIN INDEX value
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-09-04 01:14:32 Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE