Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention
Date: 2015-09-03 17:37:55
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYKSBKr67qE9-CVBqXJSLP4B73OpjfiM9H==ZVrhixS8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [ new patch ]

Andres pinged me about this patch today. It contained a couple of
very strange whitespace anomalies, but otherwise looked OK to me, so I
committed it with after fixing those issues and tweaking the comments
a bit. Hopefully we are in good shape now, but if there are any
remaining concerns, more review is welcome.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2015-09-03 17:42:19 Re: Potential GIN vacuum bug
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2015-09-03 17:36:15 Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff