Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes(at)amazon(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug
Date: 2020-09-17 12:51:59
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+63pNvmdWEMMbhjaf+hrakxg3FZCG3wthTRfXYhMQxFg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 8:54 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:26 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> >> The fix seems sensible to me.
>
> > Thanks, I think it is better to wait for a day or two as yesterday
> > only we stamped 13 and we need to backpatch this.
>
> Right, please avoid pushing anything non-critical to REL_13_STABLE
> until you see the git tag appear. I doubt we will need to re-wrap
> the tarballs, but you never know.
>

Pushed now. Sorry Peter, I forgot to give you reviewer credit in the
commit message but I really appreciate your nod for this patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Kondratov 2020-09-17 13:05:28 Re: Concurrency issue in pg_rewind
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-09-17 12:47:54 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting