Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-04-27 10:43:03
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+tFqKuHrtoOMvChD7aWC3EQUnOHxn=gDGWzkJFkGHe3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:05 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have also fixed a couple of bugs internally reported by my colleague
> Neha Sharma.
>

I think it would be good if you can briefly explain what were the bugs
and how you fixed those?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2020-04-27 11:17:41 Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2020-04-27 10:42:47 Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery