| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Date: | 2023-10-09 05:39:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+qC+JovaoRvDk4fkeaBhiTK6LYk_bxvMzb=Jg-KDT94Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:51 AM Drouvot, Bertrand
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I like the idea and I think that's the one that seems the more reasonable
> to me. I'd vote for this idea with:
>
> - standby_slot_names on the primary (could also be set on standbys in case of
> cascading context)
> - enable_failover at logical slot creation + API to enable/disable it at wish
> - enable_syncslot on the standbys
>
Thanks, these definitions sounds reasonable to me.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Guo | 2023-10-09 05:41:36 | Re: pg16: XX000: could not find pathkey item to sort |
| Previous Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2023-10-09 05:21:36 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |