Re: WAL usage calculation patch

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Bychik <kirill(dot)bychik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WAL usage calculation patch
Date: 2020-04-02 05:52:16
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+psttu3wEWkHPvzVTi6Jvsy=c4Z8cCmCU0WPUmT18+Fg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 11:07 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:00 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>

Also, I forgot to mention that let's not base this on buffer usage
patch for create index
(v10-0002-Allow-parallel-index-creation-to-accumulate-buff) because as
per recent discussion I am not sure about its usefulness. I think we
can proceed with this patch without
v10-0002-Allow-parallel-index-creation-to-accumulate-buff as well.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-02 05:58:19 Re: Allow continuations in "pg_hba.conf" files
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-02 05:41:20 Re: User Interface for WAL usage data