Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Васильев Дмитрий <d(dot)vasilyev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Date: 2016-03-19 11:14:49
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+pZHFed4w7aU1sT-H9SN-VfxbP6QETA0KsbaEGb9V30g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
>
> Attached is a significantly revised version of the earlier series. Most
> importantly I have:
> * Unified the window/unix latch implementation into one file (0004)
>

After applying patch 0004* on HEAD, using command patch -p1 <
<path_of_patch>, I am getting build failure:

c1 : fatal error C1083: Cannot open source file:
'src/backend/storage/ipc/latch.c': No such file or directory

I think it could not rename port/unix_latch.c => storage/ipc/latch.c. I
have tried with git apply, but no success. Am I doing something wrong?

One minor suggestion about patch:

+#ifndef WIN32
void
latch_sigusr1_handler(void)
{
if (waiting)
sendSelfPipeByte();
}
+#endif /* !WIN32 */

/* Send one byte to the self-pipe, to wake up WaitLatch */
+#ifndef WIN32
static void
sendSelfPipeByte(void)

Instead of individually defining these functions under #ifndef WIN32, isn't
it better to combine them all as they are at end of file.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2016-03-19 12:15:02 Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2016-03-19 10:46:00 Applying logical replication changes by more than one process