Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date: 2024-03-25 11:33:59
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+oGSQGRW3-Z1DsiNM_94jWROPX3SZ78mUAvbqOYP=Mtw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Right. Done that way i.e. not setting the last_inactive_time for slots
> both while releasing the slot and restoring from the disk.
>
> Also, I've added a TAP function to check if the captured times are
> sane per Bertrand's review comment.
>
> Please see the attached v20 patch.
>

Pushed, after minor changes.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2024-03-25 11:40:11 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2024-03-25 11:21:39 Re: Add new error_action COPY ON_ERROR "log"