Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alik Khilazhev <a(dot)khilazhev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Date: 2017-07-10 07:54:20
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+m4T3yOXncoKUmroiRhrJJC+zz_7BvkT0=0nfhZhwFtQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Alik Khilazhev <a(dot)khilazhev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
> wrote:

> Hello, Fabien!
>
> Your description is not very precise. What version of Postgres is used? If
> there is a decline, compared to which version? Is there a link to these
> results?
>
>
> Benchmark have been done in master v10. I am attaching image with results:
> .
>
>
It will be interesting to see what the profiling data with perf says about
this for PostgreSQL. Can you try to get the perf report?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-07-10 09:28:13 Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-07-10 07:15:28 Re: New partitioning - some feedback