Re: Add missing copyright for pg_upgrade/t/* files

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add missing copyright for pg_upgrade/t/* files
Date: 2023-04-04 03:43:24
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+grdj4Br7sGGs=8JO81k94iPWzuEn3WUmtf6SFQWDW-Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:25 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> While reading codes, I noticed that pg_upgrade/t/001_basic.pl and
> pg_upgrade/t/002_pg_upgrade.pl do not contain the copyright.
>
> I checked briefly and almost all files have that, so I thought they missed it.
> PSA the patch to fix them.
>

Yeah, it is good to have the Copyright to keep it consistent with
other test files and otherwise as well.

--- a/src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/001_basic.pl
+++ b/src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/001_basic.pl
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+# Copyright (c) 2022-2023, PostgreSQL Global Development Group

How did you decide on the starting year as 2022?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-04-04 03:53:00 Re: RFC: logical publication via inheritance root?
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-04-04 03:36:26 Re: O(n) tasks cause lengthy startups and checkpoints