Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"
Date: 2016-08-24 06:34:25
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+eDHSm1SQ4EJsh-q2ycFnjecbG7oVNzo1HakfGhFa7Zg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Well, that change should be part of Amit's patch to add WAL logging,
>> not this patch, whose mission is just to improve test coverage.
>
> I have just removed the warning message from expected output file as i
> have performed the testing on Amit's latest patch that removes this
> warning message from the hash index code.
>

I think you are missing what Robert wants to point out. You don't
need to remove the warning message when you are adding new test cases
on top of Mithun's patch even if those new tests helps to cover the
code path which is required for wal-hash-index patch.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-08-24 06:41:06 Collective typos in contrib/postgres_fdw (Was: Re: Incorrect comment in contrib/postgres_fdw/deparse.c)
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2016-08-24 06:32:23 Re: pgbench - minor doc improvements