| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions |
| Date: | 2021-02-22 09:41:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+e6WfZV33JvaKQh9jLA3VXPwFdNU=2N3TQUaaNxaRJCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 2:55 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-02-22 09:25:52 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote:
> > What issues do you see with the approach I proposed?
>
> Very significant increase in complexity for initializing a logical
> replica, because there's no easy way to just use the initial slot.
>
+1. The solution proposed by Andres seems to be better than other
ideas we have discussed so far.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-02-22 10:05:09 | Re: SEARCH and CYCLE clauses |
| Previous Message | Michael J. Baars | 2021-02-22 09:30:39 | Re: computing dT from an interval |