| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PSQL - prevent describe listing tables that are already in listed schemas |
| Date: | 2026-06-15 06:36:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+e-a2nEA-fzQcE91vu8XpEC62R7tshPC14gp-jX1mqYg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 7:32 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 10:54 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> >
> > On 2026-May-21, Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > > The new tests in patch v5 look good to me.
> >
> > So do we want to consider this a backpatchable bugfix, or just a
> > new-feature-ish quality of life improvement? If the former, then we
> > should probably backpatch it; otherwise we would normally wait until
> > pg20 opens. Though to be honest I would also consider this as
> > borderline okay to include in pg19 for beta2 -- especially considering
> > that the output in 19 is already changed by the EXCEPT TABLE listing
> > additions.
> >
> > Given that it applies to servers back to 15, that means that in the
> > situation where it applies, pg19's psql (or pg20's) output would be
> > different than earlier ones given identical database state. I'm not
> > sure that would be really great.
> >
> > What do others think?
>
> FWIW, when I wrote this, in my mind I considered it more like the
> "quality of life improvement" because it is mostly about not
> displaying redundant information, rather than fixing any major bug.
>
+1. I also feel this should be considered as an improvement for PG20.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2026-06-15 06:43:36 | Re: Fix SET EXPRESSION for virtual columns with whole-row dependencies |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2026-06-15 06:32:01 | Re: Row pattern recognition |