Re: error context for vacuum to include block number

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Date: 2020-03-29 06:05:44
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+dCj+V0ti45PaETdhnrHrxLYUyDuTBz_MKcvk6J2TdmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 9:04 AM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 13:23, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Please find attached the updated patch with all the changes discussed.
> > Let me know if I have missed anything?
> >
>
> Thank you for updating the patch! Looks good to me.
>

Okay, I will push this tomorrow.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-03-29 06:15:49 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-03-29 05:49:21 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions