| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Default Partition for Range |
| Date: | 2017-06-02 12:09:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+cT2OQ4tm1okUVwRX+eeqyLDWF9OvNozEpj9koi7H1Ow@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Rafia Sabih
<rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Beena,
>
> I had a look at the patch from the angle of aesthetics and there are a
> few cosmetic changes I might suggest. Please have a look at the
> attached patch and if you agree with those changes you may merge it on
> your patch. The patch also fixes a couple of more spelling mistakes
> unrelated to this patch.
>
I think if you have found spelling mistakes unrelated to this patch,
then it is better to submit those as a separate patch in a new thread.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-02 12:10:58 | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2017-06-02 11:27:36 | Re: Do we need the gcc feature "__builtin_expect" to promote the branches prediction? |