Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large
in-progress transactions
From:
Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject:
Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large
in-progress transactions
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 7:43 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: > > So, I > > used the other approach which led to the attached. > > The patch looks fine to me. >