Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2021-05-06 03:31:31
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+Zjoza12+jA8NHDb-+bALUj=a=JNqBeuApSMt19St3Gg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 7:43 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So, I
> > used the other approach which led to the attached.
>
> The patch looks fine to me.
>

Thanks, pushed!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Japin Li 2021-05-06 03:37:59 Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription.
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2021-05-06 03:28:36 Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs