| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade: optimize replication slot caught-up check |
| Date: | 2026-01-29 06:05:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+Z11LsD+G1GORMsq_M3O33zgoFkn4KT9LkxrazLr-zmg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 2:06 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I missed fixing one place. Attached the new version.
>
One question/comment on following change:
+ bool use_fast_caught_up_check;
+
+ logical_slot_infos_query = get_old_cluster_logical_slot_infos_query(cluster,
+ &use_fast_caught_up_check);
+
upgrade_task_add_step(task,
logical_slot_infos_query,
process_old_cluster_logical_slot_infos,
true, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether slots have consumed all WAL records efficiently by
+ * using another query, if not during a live_check.
+ */
+ if (use_fast_caught_up_check && !user_opts.live_check)
+ {
Won't this lead to two steps to set caught_up for slots in PG19 and
following versions? If so, is it possible to use just one step even
for PG19 and following versions?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-01-29 06:07:42 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | Lukas Fittl | 2026-01-29 05:44:26 | Re: pg_plan_advice |