Re: Re: BUG #15039: some question about hash index code

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: 自己 <zoulx1982(at)163(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #15039: some question about hash index code
Date: 2018-01-31 12:44:51
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+TOrM09OYhAff2O4oYtWxOz4WsTTsf2UEstoW6owaZxw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:57 PM, 自己 <zoulx1982(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
> thank you for your quick reply.
> and i have another question, for the following code, whether exist such
> scene : page_found is false and
> newmapbuf is invalid, if so, may be the statement MarkBufferDirty(metabuf);
> should be placed outside the if statement ?
>

On a quick look, your observation seems to be right and I think in
this function we might call markbufferdirty twice for meta page which
doesn't seem to be required. In any case, tomorrow I will look at
this code again and can send a patch to fix it unless you want to send
a patch to fix it.

Thanks for reporting the problem.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2018-01-31 16:23:38 BUG #15040: "could not open relation" error
Previous Message 自己 2018-01-31 12:27:26 Re:Re: BUG #15039: some question about hash index code

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sanyam jain 2018-01-31 12:51:57 Re: [HACKERS] Why forcing Hot_standby_feedback to be enabled when creating a logical decoding slot on standby
Previous Message 自己 2018-01-31 12:27:26 Re:Re: BUG #15039: some question about hash index code