From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
Date: | 2020-12-05 06:00:56 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+QwmQUJZqiqydTDkpy2CxG9At0Uduj7fuA4KLKQLbZtw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:50 PM Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> > The earlier version of the patch having all these ideas
> > implemented is attached
> > (Infrastructure-to-execute-pending-undo-actions and
> > Provide-interfaces-to-store-and-fetch-undo-records). The second one
> > has some APIs used by the first one but the main concepts were
> > implemented in the first one
> > (Infrastructure-to-execute-pending-undo-actions). I see that in the
> > current version these can't be used as it is but still it can give us
> > a good start point and we might be able to either re-use some code and
> > or ideas from these patches.
>
> Is there a branch with these patches applied? They reference some functions
> that I don't see in [1]. I'd like to examine if / how my approach can be
> aligned with the current zheap design.
>
Can you once check in the patch-set attached in the email [1]?
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKG%2BMpzRsZFE7ChhRq-Br5VYYi6mafVQ73Af7ahioWo5o8w%40mail.gmail.com
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2020-12-05 07:22:13 | Re: [PATCH] Add support for leading/trailing bytea trim()ing |
Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2020-12-05 05:18:54 | Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT |