Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mahendra Singh <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date: 2019-11-26 05:01:07
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+PVf4sqrugRpMt_byDDMN3dE0O-tKq-9AogwPrrYFQvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:42 PM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 10:19, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 11:01 AM Masahiko Sawada
> > <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I've attached the latest version patch set. The patch set includes all
> > > discussed points regarding index AM options as well as shared cost
> > > balance. Also I added some test cases used all types of index AM.
> > >
> >
> > I have reviewed the first patch and made a number of modifications
> > that include adding/modifying comments, made some corrections and
> > modifications in the documentation. You can find my changes in
> > v33-0001-delta-amit.patch. See, if those look okay to you, if so,
> > please include those in the next version of the patch. I am attaching
> > both your version of patch and delta changes by me.
>
> Thank you.
>
> All changes look good to me. But after changed the 0002 patch the two
> macros for parallel vacuum options (VACUUM_OPTIONS_SUPPORT_XXX) is no
> longer necessary. So we can remove them and can add if we need them
> again.
>

Sounds reasonable.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-11-26 05:19:06 Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-26 04:59:14 Re: accounting for memory used for BufFile during hash joins